Events Of May 27, 2009

Perhaps it’s no coincidence that I was stopped on the way out of Monroe County jail with my daughter waiting outside to take me home.

Perhaps it’s no coincidence that for 2 ½ months I had been kept in solitary confinement without an explanation to myself or my attorney. It was only after the intervention  of Mental Health that I was finally removed.

Perhaps it’s no coincidence that for the first time ever, the DA holds a major media event for a conspiracy charge against a non-public figure.

Perhaps it’s no coincidence that the DA’s office FALSELY tells the media that I had previously been convicted of kidnapping when I had in fact never been charged with such a crime. This resulted in extensive TV coverage for the following 36 hours. This even going as far as interviewing not only my current neighbors, but those of my prior home of several years ago as well. Moreover, I received more media coverage than most murder suspects. Why do you the reader think that was?

Until a few years ago nobody, attorney or lay personal like, could explain why the above event took place, especially the ADA involved, fabricating a kidnapping conviction. As a staff attorney, that could have been due cause for her termination. But perhaps as a result, explaining why at my trial the prosecutor replaced the actual charge, conspiracy, with that non-existent kidnapping.

Perhaps it’s no coincidence that on that very same day, Elizabeth Clarke, with whom I had previously ended a four-month relationship via email, contacts WHEC TV news for an interview as follows:

“We spoke with another woman, Elizabeth Clarke who said she too had been victimized by Dizak. She did not want to go on camera because she is scared for her safety. She knew Dizak was supposed to get out of jail this week and she was preparing for it. The new allegations of murder for hire will keep Dizak in jail for the time being, but she was horrified at the accusations. When we asked her if she was afraid of Dizak she responded, God yes’.”

Perhaps it’s no coincidence that unknown to me at the time was that Ms. Clarke was now employed by the Fourth Appellate Department, the very same court that would later review and deny my appeal – ignoring or refusing to comment on numerous issues that would have been due cause for reversal of my conviction.

Only by happenstance was I made aware Ms. Clarke’s involvement and employment by the court.  This when she bragged to another staff member how she “stuck it to me.”  That individual mentioned said comments to his/her spouse who happened to know me.